Rami Landa, head of Meitar’s Employment and Benefits Group writes that the enforcement of a mandatory retirement age not only contradicts the law, but is also not compatible with today’s employment and labor environment. The National Labor Court’s recent ruling further implies that forcing an employee to leave at the mandatory retirement age is prejudicial and may contravene Israel’s Basic Human Rights Law.
For the full article in Hebrew,
The Meitar Liquornik Geva & Leshem Brandwin law firm, which has 160 attorneys and Kantor Elhanani Tal & Co., Advocates, which has 43 attorneys, merged in January 2013. The combined firm, with over 200 attorneys, including 58 partners, is one of Israel’s largest law firms.
For coverage of the merger in the Hebrew press, please visit:
The Merger is Official
Calcalist, 27/01/13
For the full article in Hebrew, please click here.
Merger Forms Israel’s Third Largest Law Firm
Globes, 27/01/13
For the full article in Hebrew, please click here.
Meitar Liquornik Geva & Leshem Brandwin Merges With Kantor Elhanani Tal & Co.
The Marker, 27/01/13
For the full article in Hebrew, please click here.
In a landmark ruling of the National Labor Court on workers’ rights to unionize, the court determined that an employer may not state its position on the intention of employees to unionize, as this may exert pressure and undue influence on the exercise of their rights. Rami Landa, Head of Meitar’s Employment and Benefits Group, posits that this silence could in fact work to the employees’ detriment, such as cases when an acquisition is being negotiated and unionization would put the negotiations, and the employees’ potential financial gain, in peril.
For the full article in Hebrew,
